Special Notice to New Hampshire Airmen
Hello, my name is Carsten Schanche. I am the President of Aviation Assoc. of New Hampshire.
I am writing all New Hampshire Airmen due to a unique and serious situation facing aviation in our great state.
The New Hampshire Department of Transportation Ð Division of Aeronautics led by Director Jack Ferns has done a study of our ten privately owned/public use airports and found that five of them are planning to sell the properties within the next 2 years! (In addition, a sixth airport is in desperate need of maintenance of its runway, an expense which is outside the ability of the owner to afford.)
This means that a vital part of the New Hampshire infrastructure, five of our very precious airports, could be sold to developers
and will be lost forever. Oncehouses are built, we know the properties will never ever be returned to aviation use.
The study has been turned into a report and submitted to the State of New HampshireÕs Governor and Executive Council. The report is very constructive and well written, and outlines suggested actions to be taken by our stateÕs leaders to preserve these endangered airports. However, it is uncertain if these leaders, who are under political pressure from competing interests, will be acting in the interest of a silent aviation.
Aviation Association of New Hampshire (AANH) was founded in 1954 to, amongst others, work to protect and preserve aviation in our wonderful state. AANH is uniquely positioned to do this, with a
legislated position on the stateÕs Aviation Users Advisory Board. This board advises Jack Ferns, the Director of Aeronautics, Rail and Transit, on matters important to aviation. Jack is a long-time member of AANH as was his father before him. He is a big friend of general aviation, but we can not demand that he talk aviations case alone. The political powers must be made to understand that there are many, many NH Airmen that are not going to quietly accept that half of our privately owned, public use airports could disappear from the stateÕs infrastructure.
AANH sees that an unprecedented situation is facing aviation in our great state. As such we are planning to act and lobby hard to protect your freedom of flight. But to do that we need your help. The more members we have, the stronger we speak. We are therefore hoping that you will support AANH by becoming a member, a small effort on your part. Your membership will greatly assist our work to preserve New HampshireÕs endangered airports for those who use the airport system in NH, or are dependent on a healthy aviation climate in our state due to your profession as aviation mechanics, control tower operators or aviation business people.
As AANH starts to act on your behalf on this, we will communicate our progress directly with our members through mailings, our quarterly membership newsletter, our membership website, or, as needed, through telephone and membership meetings.
Let me finish by saying this: A couple of times in oneÕs life a situation comes along where there is a clear choice between the right thing to do and the wrong thing to do. The wrong thing is to just sit back, ignore the situation and hope it goes away, because it wonÕt. The right thing to do is to help preserve our endangered airports. To that end, I am asking you to help us fight this battle in a very simple way. Please become an AANH member so that we may speak more loudly by representing as many Airmen in NH as possible.
Sincerely yours,
Carsten H. Schanche
President, AANH
To become a member and help us preserve our airports, you may download a printable membership form [ here ], or join immediately online [ here ]
This is a partial copy of the report. To view the complete report you must be an AANH member. Join via the links above.
The Preservation of
Privately-Owned Airports
Report
Prepared for
State of New Hampshire
Governor and Executive Council
The Long Range Capital
Planning and Utilization Committee
Prepared by
Department of
Transportation, Division of Aeronautics
in conjunction with the
Aviation Users Advisory Board
and the assistance of
Local
Municipalities
Executive Summary
The New Hampshire Department of Transportation,
Division of Aeronautics is tasked by state statute to provide the citizens of
New Hampshire with an air transportation system that is safe, efficient and
socially responsible. The Division
interacts with the stateÕs airports in a number of ways including airport
funding, registration, regulatory-enforcement of laws, operation of navigational
aids, as a technical resource, as well as the promotion of airports. Collectively tying all of these
services together, the DivisionÕs main mission is to ÒPreserveÓ the airports
already existing within the State Airport System.
By
2006 it is entirely possible that New Hampshire will lose one-half of its
privately owned, open to the public airports. Privately owned-open to the public airports are a critical
part of any states airport system, especially states like New Hampshire where
tremendous efforts are made to avoid over-burdening public treasuries. These airports are among the most
efficient public use facilities.
For the most part, they do not depend on the public funding for their
support; yet they provide a necessary public benefit: capacity for, and entry
into the National Air Transportation System. Loss of these airports means
several thousand aircraft operations will stress capacity at remaining
airports. Ironically, the net effect of this outcome is that further public investment is mandated to meet increased demand on
publicly funded facilities. The
requirements of RSA 422:19 tasked the Division of Aeronautics and Aviation
Users Advisory Board (AUAB) with the evaluation of privately owned, open to the
public airports in New Hampshire.
Privately owned, open to the public airports are
experiencing increased pressures from local development, environmental
legislation, limited funding, and increases in land value assessment. Coupled with these are the high
operational, maintenance, and insurance costs associated with operating
airports. In preparation of this
report to the state legislature, five out of ten airport owners advised that
they are likely to cease operations in 2005/2006 under these current
conditions. One additional airport
that has not expressed an interest in closing is in need of maintenance on its
runway system. The expense of this
project is outside of the ability of the owner to afford. Likewise the Division of Aeronautics is
unable to fund such an expensive project without subsequently failing to fund
the other development needs on the remaining airports.
The
preservation of airports is critical not only to the regional and National
Airway System but to the communities in, and near which the airport is
located. As is the case with any
transportation center, its practical benefits typically span beyond
manufactured political boundaries.
Chief among these benefits is access in time of emergency or public
distress. Well maintained airports
are capable of providing rapid access to government emergency relief, medical,
and law enforcement personnel on a large scale. Secondary benefits include access for local business
services, high value tourism, and local recreation. A tertiary benefit is creation and maintenance of open
space, and preservation of natural environments.
Priority of Airports
In order to deliver a practical and useful document
to the Governor and Executive Council, and Long Range Capital Planning and
Utilization Committee a determination has been made by the Division of
Aeronautics and the AUAB on the priority of these airports. Elements such as the proximity of other
airports, levels of activity/based aircraft, economic benefits, services and/or
FBOs, and the needed financial investment to bring the airports up to current
standards have been factored into this consideration. These priorities are only valid based on the existing
system of airports, should any evaluative element change, it would be the task
of the Division of Aeronautics and AUAB to vet the system and determine a new
priority.
The Long Range Capital Planning and Utilization
Committee should protect the existing system, by preserving the following
airports based on three priority tiers:
|
First Tier Airports |
Second Tier Airports |
Third Tier Airports |
|
Hampton Airfield, North Hampton; NH |
Lakes-Region Airport;
Wolfeboro, NH[1] |
Gifford Field;
Colebrook, NH |
|
|
|
|
|
Jaffrey-Airport Silver Ranch; Jaffrey, NH[2] |
Newfound Valley Airport; Bristol, NH |
Errol Airport; Errol, NH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hawthorne-Feather
Airport; Deering, NH |
Twin Mountain Airport; Carroll, NH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moultonborough Airport; Moultonborough, NH |
Franconia Airport; Franconia, NH |
|
|
|
|
Note: Airports in Bold are airports that have expressed they may
sell in the next two years
Recommendations
for Preservation of Private Airports
Legal/Risk Management Forum: The
Division of Aeronautics and the AUAB should arrange a legal/risk forum to
provide counseling to open to the public privately owned airports to discuss
legal options that will protect long-term existence of airports. This forum could also discuss insurance
issues so that airports are properly insured for disaster, liability, and other
risk related issues.
Airport Operating Leases: The
state of New Hampshire should pursue and encourage airport owners to consider
long-term management agreements for their facility if they no longer are able,
or desire to operate the facility.
Increase Grant
Funding: The State of New Hampshire should increase funding for various airport
grant programs. Specifically, the
Tax Re-imbursement program should be increased from $10,000 to $15,000 per
annum. The 50-50 funding program
should be refined and funding increased to the 1986 level of $100,000 per year.
New State
managed process for permitting of airport development: Airport development should be removed from local permitting processes
and put under the jurisdiction of a state permitting process. This process could be administratively
handled through the Division of Aeronautics, and the Office of Energy and
Planning.
Current use
provisions: Criteria should be formulated to permit certain unpaved
airports the latitude to take advantage of current use provisions. This has been attempted legislatively
in the past but failed. The tax
reimbursement program was instituted in part as an alternative to this
provision.
Conclusion
The
enactment of RSA 422:19, will do well to streamline the acquisition of private
airports critical to the New Hampshire State Airport System. Meanwhile
carefully vetting the need to acquire airports if they become available. This study produced in more
detail in the following chapter, will give clear direction on the issues facing
public use, privately owned airports, and determine the best manner in which
the state can assist in the long term preservation of these extremely efficient
facilities. Barring renewed
interest from the state, in the form of these or similar recommendations,
private open to the public airports in New Hampshire will likely cease to
exist. This will put a tremendous
burden on the state to replace, or provide its citizens adequate access to the
National Air Transportation System.
[1] Lake Region Airport has not registered in 2004, and may close in 2005, however it was included in this study because airports from time to time may fail to register for one year, and renew their registration in the following year.
[2] Jaffrey Airport Ð Silver Ranch has significant maintenance issues that must be addressed ASAP, or the state will no longer be able to support its status as an open to the public airport.